Rejecting Ruby Payne https://deficitperspectivesdebunked.wordpress.com/debunking-ruby-payne/ Especially http://www.tolerance.org/magazine/number-52-spring-2016/feature/questioning-payne + http://www.tolerance.org/questioning-payne
The New Year Continues our Discussion between Authors Paul Thomas and Curt Dudley-Marling
The "Word Gap": A Reader
"What These Children Are Like": Rejecting Deficit Views of Poverty and Language
Revisiting James Baldwin's "Black English"
If Black English Isn't a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is?, James Baldwin
CCCC Statement on Ebonics
*Bomer, R., Dworin, J. E., May, L., &
Semingson, P. (2008). Miseducating teachers about the poor: A critical analysis
of Ruby Payne's claims about poverty. Teachers College Record, 110(11).
"What These Children Are Like": Rejecting Deficit Views of Poverty and Language
Revisiting James Baldwin's "Black English"
If Black English Isn't a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is?, James Baldwin
CCCC Statement on Ebonics
[See http://rubypayneiswrong.blogspot.com/
for an updated listing of research/resources debunking Payne's deficit view.]
Journal of Educational
Controversy
Volume 4, Number 1, Winter 2009
The Hidden Dimensions of Poverty: Rethinking Poverty and
Education
*Bomer, R., Dworin, J. E., May, L., &
Semingson, P. (2008). Miseducating teachers about the poor: A critical analysis
of Ruby Payne's claims about poverty. Teachers College Record, 110(11).
Dworin, J. E.,
& Bomer, R. (2008, January). What we all (supposedly) know about the poor:
A critical discourse analysis of Ruby Payne’s “Framework.” English Education, 40(2). 101-121.
Dudley-Marling,
C. (2007). Return of the deficit. Journal
of Educational Controvery, 2(1). Available on-line: http://www.wce.wwu.edu/Resources/CEP/eJournal/v002n001/a004.shtml.
*Gorski, P.
(2006, February 9). The classist underpinnings of Ruby Payne’s Framework. Teachers College Record.
Gorski, P. (2008,
April). The myth of the “culture of poverty.” Educational Leadership, 65(7). 32-36.
*Ng, J. C., &
Rury, J. L. (2006, July 18). Poverty and education: A critical analysis of the
Ruby Payne phenomenon. Teachers College
Record.
*See the Payne response and two counter-responses from TCR
(included in your Topic 12 folder).
Payne, R.K.
(2009). Using the lens of economic class to help teachers understand and teach
students from poverty: A response. Teachers
College Record, Date Published: May 17, 2009, http://www.tcrecord.org ID
Number: 15629, Date Accessed: 5/21/2009 1:52:39 PM.
Bomer, R.,
Dworin, J. E., May, L., & Semingson, P. (2009, June 3). What’s wrong with a
deficit perspective? Teachers College
Record, Date Published: June 03, 2009 http://www.tcrecord.org ID Number:
15648, Date Accessed: 6/12/2009 8:39:17 AM.
Gorski, P. (2006,
July 19). Responding to Payne’s response. Teachers
College Record, Date Published: July 19, 2006 http://www.tcrecord.org ID
Number: 12605, Date Accessed: 6/12/2009 8:37:26 AM.
Thomas, P. L.
(2009). Shifting from deficit to generative practices: Addressing impoverished
and all students. Teaching Children of
Poverty, 1(1). http://journals.sfu.ca/tcop/index.php/tcop/issue/view/1
Thomas, P. L.
(2010, July/September). The Payne of addressing race and poverty in public
education: Utopian accountability and deficit assumptions of middle class
America. Souls, 12(3).
No comments:
Post a Comment